IN TODAY'S SIGNAL
| Read time: 6 min 32 sec | 🎖️ Top News
đź“Ś Ray Summit
⚡️ Trending Signals
🧠Top Papers
🧠Lecture
|
|
|
|
If you're enjoying AlphaSignal please forward this email to a colleague.Â
It helps us keep this content free. |
|
|
|
TOP NEWS
| LLM | NVIDIA just dropped Nemotron 51B - 220% faster and can handle 400% more workload than Llama 3.1 70B |
⇧ 1,054 Likes |
 |
What's New | NVIDIA has introduced Llama-3.1-Nemotron-51B, a language model derived from Meta's Llama-3.1-70B. It achieves 2.2x faster inference and handles 4x larger workloads on a single GPU while maintaining comparable accuracy to its parent model.
Key highlights
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-51B is optimized with TensorRT-LLM engines and packaged as an NVIDIA NIM inference microservice for streamlined deployment. It's available through the NVIDIA AI API with free credits for testing.Â
The model was trained on 40 billion tokens from FineWeb, Buzz-V1.2, and Dolma datasets.
Achieves best accuracy per dollar on the efficiency frontier.
Packaged as NVIDIA NIM inference microservice for easy deployment
Access and License Core innovation in this model Performance metrics demonstrate significant improvements
Superior throughput. Text generation 6,472 tokens/s/GPU vs 2,975 for Llama-3.1-70B.Â
Summarization efficiency: 653 tokens/s/GPU vs 339 for Llama-3.1-70B
MT Bench score: 8.99 vs 8.93 for Llama-3.1-70B
MMLU accuracy: 80.2% vs 81.66% for Llama-3.1-70B
The model preserves 98-100% accuracy across various benchmarks compared to Llama-3.1-70B.
NVIDIA also created Llama-3.1-Nemotron-40B, prioritizing speed over accuracy, achieving a 3.2x speed increase compared to the parent model.
This approach demonstrates potential for creating multiple efficient models from a single reference model, each optimized for specific hardware and inference scenarios. The technique could be applied to other language models or architectures, opening possibilities for smaller, more efficient models suitable for edge devices |
|
READ MORE
|
|
|
|
| Ray Summit: The World’s Largest Gathering of Open Source AI Leaders is Only 8 Days Away | Ray Summit kicks off next week. Join developers and researchers from top companies to explore AI's cutting edge.
Topics include
LLM fine-tuning and inference at scale
Distributed computing challenges
Latest in AI infrastructure Keynote speeches by:
Marc Andreessen (Andreessen Horowitz)
Mira Murati (CTO, OpenAI)
Anastasis Germanidis (Co-Founder & CTO , Runway)
And many more
|
GET 15% OFF
| partner with us |
|
|
|
TRENDING SIGNALS
| LLM |
|
⇧ 1,000 Likes | |
Computer Vision |
|
⇧ 452 Likes | |
AI Code generation |
|
⇧ 1,800 Likes | |
Local LLM |
|
⇧ 1,700 Likes | |
AGI |
|
⇧ 13,000 Likes | | |
|
|
|
|
|
TOP PAPERS
| LLM |
|
⇧ 795 Likes |
Problem LLMs struggle with planning tasks, as demonstrated by poor performance on PlanBench. OpenAI's new o1 model claims to be a "Large Reasoning Model" (LRM) with improved planning abilities. This paper evaluates o1's performance on PlanBench compared to standard LLMs and classical planners.
Solution The authors test o1-preview and o1-mini on PlanBench's Blocksworld and Mystery Blocksworld tasks, comparing results to top LLMs and the Fast Downward planner. They evaluate accuracy, efficiency, and ability to recognize unsolvable problems. The study also examines o1's performance on longer planning tasks and considers cost-effectiveness.
Results O1-preview achieves 97.8% accuracy on 3-5 block Blocksworld problems and 52.8% on Mystery Blocksworld, vastly outperforming LLMs. However, performance degrades on longer tasks (23.63% for 6-20 blocks). O1 struggles with unsolvable problems and is significantly more expensive than LLMs or classical planners. While impressive, o1's planning abilities are not yet robust or cost-effective. |
| RLHF |
|
⇧ 2,300 Likes |
Problem LLMs lack effective self-correction abilities, struggling to improve their own responses without external input. Existing approaches rely on multiple models or oracle supervision. The paper aims to develop a method for training LLMs to self-correct using only self-generated data.
Solution The authors propose SCoRe, a two-stage multi-turn reinforcement learning approach: Train a model initialization less prone to collapse by optimizing second-attempt performance while constraining first-attempt responses. Run multi-turn RL with reward shaping to incentivize self-correction behavior. SCoRe addresses challenges of distribution mismatch and mode collapse in supervised fine-tuning approaches.
Results SCoRe achieves state-of-the-art self-correction performance on MATH and HumanEval benchmarks, improving base Gemini models by 15.6% and 9.1% respectively. It outperforms baselines in both direct generation and self-correction accuracy. |
| Transformers |
| ⇧ 1,170 Likes |
Problem LLMs rely heavily on MLPs for information mixing, but MLPs face limitations in modeling complex functions. Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) offer a potentially more expressive alternative, but integrating KANs into transformers has been challenging due to scalability issues.
Solution The authors introduce Kolmogorov–Arnold Transformer (KAT), which replaces MLPs with Group-Rational KAN (GR-KAN) layers. Key innovations include: Rational activation functions for GPU efficiency Group KAN to reduce parameters and computation Variance-preserving initialization for stable training
These enhancements allow KAT to scale effectively to large models.
Results KAT consistently outperforms traditional MLP-based transformers across various vision tasks:
ImageNet-1K: KAT-B achieves 82.3% accuracy, surpassing ViT-B by 3.2% COCO object detection: KAT-S improves AP_box by 3.0 over ViTDet-S ADE20K semantic segmentation: KAT-S achieves 2.6% higher mIoU than DeiT-S | | |
| |
|
|
LECTURE
| Llama | Learn converting GPT to Llama 2 architecture by Sebastian Raschka. |
⇧ 1,414 Likes |
 |
Sebastian Raschka's tutorial breaks down the key differences between GPT and Llama 2 architectures. It provides a step-by-step guide to convert a GPT model into Llama 2, highlighting the fundamental changes in model structure and components. This practical walkthrough helps you understand the inner workings of these large language models.
You'll learn about Replacing LayerNorm with RMSNorm
Switching from GELU to SiLU activation
Implementing rotary position embeddings (RoPE)
Updating the FeedForward module with SwiGLU
Loading and using pretrained Llama 2 weights
Adapting the tokenizer for Llama 2 The tutorial includes code snippets and explanations for each modification, allowing you to follow along and implement the changes yourself. |
READ MORE
|
|
|
|
|